<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Object/Relational Tools &#8211; NHibernate and Microsoft ADO.NET Entity Framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/</link>
	<description>tv programmed by the collective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damon Wilder Carr</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Wilder Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Valid points Yuri, however I think the argument of .NET vs. Java is irrelevant now. As you say it is a matter of personal style and choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valid points Yuri, however I think the argument of .NET vs. Java is irrelevant now. As you say it is a matter of personal style and choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>If you cannot .NET as it is and have to use some additional products like NHibernate than why not switch completely to Java? I converted to Java upon discovering Spring, Hibernate, JSF - you woulnd&#039;t like to miss them, even thouigh Visual Studio is still a bit more comfortable, I like Eclipse too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you cannot .NET as it is and have to use some additional products like NHibernate than why not switch completely to Java? I converted to Java upon discovering Spring, Hibernate, JSF &#8211; you woulnd&#8217;t like to miss them, even thouigh Visual Studio is still a bit more comfortable, I like Eclipse too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Acheson</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Acheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I currently have major web applications and web services live in production using NHibernate and Subsonic as well as ADO.NET Entity Framework. I have yet to compare Entity Framework with NHibernate. However, I have performed some comparasons between Subsonic and NHibernate.

An important consideration for me is that Entity Framework offers significantly improved performance compared to Subsonic:-

http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jun/entity_framework_vs_subsonic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have major web applications and web services live in production using NHibernate and Subsonic as well as ADO.NET Entity Framework. I have yet to compare Entity Framework with NHibernate. However, I have performed some comparasons between Subsonic and NHibernate.</p>
<p>An important consideration for me is that Entity Framework offers significantly improved performance compared to Subsonic:-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jun/entity_framework_vs_subsonic" rel="nofollow">http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jun/entity_framework_vs_subsonic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronpargybon</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>ronpargybon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to pass some info along about a microsoft critical update that was in
the news a couple days ago, you can google for info or I have provided a link below.
I was sitting on my couch looking at my computer screen and noticed my mouse moving
around and became irate, you guys be careful.

http://wchurl.info/32ms-update -  http://wchurl.info/32ms-update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to pass some info along about a microsoft critical update that was in<br />
the news a couple days ago, you can google for info or I have provided a link below.<br />
I was sitting on my couch looking at my computer screen and noticed my mouse moving<br />
around and became irate, you guys be careful.</p>
<p><a href="http://wchurl.info/32ms-update" rel="nofollow">http://wchurl.info/32ms-update</a> &#8211;  <a href="http://wchurl.info/32ms-update" rel="nofollow">http://wchurl.info/32ms-update</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kolczyki</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>kolczyki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Exelent article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exelent article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antoschka</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>antoschka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Hi, just another question. I do not understand completely how to split up the file type in different assemblies. 

I have four types of files.
- mapping files (*hbm.xml)
- entity classes, which represent my tables 
- Data Access Classes, which work with my entity classes - its a abstraction layer between entity and business classes, so I do not smutch neither one of them
- Business Classes, which use the Data from the Access Classes within the Business Logic defintion

mapping and entity files are generated. If something changes in the data model I do not have to transfer addition coding from my former entity classes, but I just replace the old ones with the new ones. Manual code changes will be only made in the access class.

Which file types would you combine in one assembly?

Thanks in advance

antoschka</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just another question. I do not understand completely how to split up the file type in different assemblies. </p>
<p>I have four types of files.<br />
- mapping files (*hbm.xml)<br />
- entity classes, which represent my tables<br />
- Data Access Classes, which work with my entity classes &#8211; its a abstraction layer between entity and business classes, so I do not smutch neither one of them<br />
- Business Classes, which use the Data from the Access Classes within the Business Logic defintion</p>
<p>mapping and entity files are generated. If something changes in the data model I do not have to transfer addition coding from my former entity classes, but I just replace the old ones with the new ones. Manual code changes will be only made in the access class.</p>
<p>Which file types would you combine in one assembly?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
<p>antoschka</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://team.pushbomb.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcarr.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/objectrelational-tools-nhibernate-and-microsoft-adonet-entity-framework/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Very nice post Damon. I agree with placing the XML in the Data Tier.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post Damon. I agree with placing the XML in the Data Tier.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
